URLs and service pages
Inventory important pages before changing structure.
Mobile speed and layout
Make the first screen faster, clearer, and easier to act on.
I work with established local service businesses. Some have useful pages, content, analytics, and search visibility to protect. Others need a clean rebuild. The Website Grade shows what should stay, what should change, and which path makes sense.
Before modernization
After modernization
Sample diagnostic artifact. Not a client audit, not a result, and no score is implied.
The grade looks for engineering and conversion failures that make a strong local business feel weaker online than it is in the field.
A ready customer should not have to hunt for the call, quote, or service path.
Outdated layouts, weak hierarchy, and thin service pages can make a good operator look ordinary.
Slow mobile loading makes every referral, search visit, and paid click work harder.
A service page should match the job, area, proof, and contact step the customer needs.
Migration discipline
Before recommending a migration, I inventory the current site: useful URLs, content, forms, analytics, Search Console, domain and integration details, and anything else that affects customers or search. If there is little worth carrying forward, the right answer can be a clean rebuild instead of moving old problems into a new site.
The goal is judgment before movement, not a guarantee. Keep what earns its place, redirect what must move, and replace what should not be carried forward.
Preserve
Improve
Inventory important pages before changing structure.
Make the first screen faster, clearer, and easier to act on.
Carry useful page context forward instead of wiping it out.
Make the next step visible without forcing a visitor to hunt.
Keep measurement continuity where access and setup allow it.
Show proof, service fit, and accountability before the decision point.
Check the business plumbing before launch, not after a lead goes missing.
Replace fragile page-builder or theme work with a simpler site that can be supported.
A score alone does not justify a rebuild. The process translates evidence into a keep, repair, preservation-led rebuild, clean-foundation rebuild, or landing-page recommendation before implementation starts.
Review performance, mobile usability, contact paths, technical structure, and existing strengths.
Inventory valuable URLs, content, metadata, tracking, forms, and integrations before deciding whether they deserve migration.
Choose the practical path: keep the current site, repair weak parts, rebuild with preservation, rebuild cleanly, or create a focused landing page.
Implement the agreed repair, landing page, or rebuild with one accountable technical owner.
Test forms, calls to action, redirects, analytics, responsive behavior, accessibility, performance, and whether search engines can correctly find the new site.
Support the site after launch when care is part of the purchased scope.
Concept Demonstration
This synthetic page shows how the grade turns a vague redesign conversation into specific page and conversion decisions. It is not a client engagement and not a result.
Services · Areas · Contact
Book a repair visit
Tell us what is wrong and when you need someone.
The grade flags pages where every message carries the same weight and the first decision is unclear.
Claims that cannot be shown, measured, or backed by real business facts are removed.
A phone visitor should see a clear next step before the page asks for patience.
The page names the work, area, and next step in the words a customer would use.
Synthetic layouts authored for this demonstration. Not a client site, not an engagement, and no result is implied.
The grade decides which path fits. A useful current site should not be rebuilt just because it is old, and an established business with a weak site should not be patched forever.
For websites that do not yet need a full rebuild.
For sites that need replacement, either with valuable assets preserved or from a clean foundation.
For paid search, local campaigns, or service-specific acquisition.
For ongoing support after launch.
The work is intentionally small and technical: one person grades the current site, protects what should stay, and builds the agreed fix.
Common path
Start with a visual refresh before the current site has been measured.
Corvio
A grade of the current implementation before any recommendation.
Common path
Focus on page styling while performance, forms, and tracking stay secondary.
Corvio
Performance, site structure, conversion paths, accessibility, and reliability.
Common path
Treat the existing site as a blank slate.
Corvio
Preserve what matters. Replace what does not.
Common path
Use taste and mockups as the main evidence for the recommendation.
Corvio
Measured evidence, manual review, and plain recommendations.
You work directly with the software engineer who grades the site, designs the fix, builds it, and maintains it after launch.
I build production software professionally: Android applications, AWS back ends, and React and TypeScript front ends. Before that I worked as a loan officer, where the job was turning inbound interest into signed business through marketing funnels, paid social campaigns, and close attention to where people stopped filling in the form. Corvio Labs applies those two disciplines to local business websites: measure the breakage, decide what matters, then build the fix.
Start with a free grade of the site you have now. The next step may be repair, rebuild, landing-page work, or care.